User talk:CookedPelvis

Infobox images

You are replacing big images in the infoboxes on item pages with small images from the WynnIcon template. This is not the intended use for it. The spritesheet images are meant exclusively for the use in text or tables. Infoboxes need bigger and fully detailed images that are uploaded separately. I suggest you revert all the changes you have made in this manner. I would like to hear Colin's opinion first though. Thanks, --Gr4phene (talk) 02:43, 17 January 2017 (EST)

I won't make anymore changes like this, but I'll wait for Colin's input before reverting. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --CookedPelvis (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2017 (EST)

I suggested for now via private message that we revert pages which have full scaled images (mainly all items except weapons & not-diamond armour). I'm not sure about your (Gr4phene's) plan about uploading images of weapon models & other armour variants, but for now the WynnIcon/ArmourIcon can suffice for those pages. Anything else should use the full scale images like you said. --Colin350 (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2017 (EST)

I agree that we don't need large images for armour pieces, as they all look the same. But we could think of adding renders of the weapons to infoboxes on certain pages, e.g. mythic or legendary weapons. Someone on the forums has made a tool to create such renders. The weapon sprites from the WeaponIcon template are all shrunk to fit in the grid so they are pixelated/blurry and less detailed than the original images. For other pages, I'd say a big image is always better than a small image, so if one exists, don't replace it. --Gr4phene (talk) 04:53, 19 January 2017 (EST)

Items

I noticed that the lists of items(normal unique rare) aren't up to date. The list of legendaries i just updated some days ago, it take me like 2hours. Now, is it really worth it to update the lists of normal/unique/rare items? --ADDB (talk) 08:37, 24 January 2017 (EST)

You should be asking me these questions in the future. But CookedPelvis' knows my answer: If you want to update the lists, go ahead, but if it's not a priority task on the to-do list, don't worry about it. Instead focus on what is 1! on the todo list. --Colin350 (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2017 (EST)

Well I asked that question in the Community portal before, and since he is active in editing I thought he could know the wander. I'll ask you next time. --ADDB (talk) 07:36, 25 January 2017 (EST)